The real question is why can't there be different points of view here or anywhere? Why can't someone post their opinion here without questioning their integrity? I stay away from posting on Yahoo to avoid the nonsense.
I read all the posts on all three boards and it seems to me that putting the feud aside, there are real issues here. Argo thinks that Geo is painting a false picture of reality and Geo thinks Argo is on a destructive bender to get him. Argo believes in his analytical perspective.
Argo has been extremely obnoxious, but has made many good points on both the Yahoo & Investor Village boards. He has not said anything bearish about Xenacare. If you go back and look at the threads, Geo refused to answer Argo from day one. Argo got pissed, Geo got insulted, Argo got more pissed, Geo got more pissed and here we are. Which came first the chicken or the egg?
It seems easy to me for two adults to work out their differences and work productively together to promote their allegedly mutually bullish interests. Maybe things have gotten out of hand to the point that it is too late. Or maybe there are some people who know both parties who can mediate and defuse the situation.
When Geo blames Argo for the stock falling and Argo points out that this is a bear market, I look at my holdings and see that Xenacare is not much different than any other stocks I own. They are all getting killed.
I think that Geo and Argo are acting like fighting married couple. Step one should be for them to just speak about the stock and not about each other. Keep the personal out of it, but by all means have a dialogue. This is not the Clantons and the McCoys. We need a mediator.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
