AI
Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:52:22 AM
Hello Conrad,
I think I prefer the term Retarded AIM.
When I plugged the Floating Safe into the Lichello cycle, it very much killed the action. I think one of the ideas of Lichello is to buy/sell proportionally more on dips/tops the deeper/higher they are. See Twinvest, see Synchrovest, see AIM. When you dampen that action with a floating safe, you are left with a sorry critter. It might show a little action with very small swings, because the safes are low then, but I don't think this compensates for the lost action with bigger moves.
Can you show some attractive points of Retarded AIM, apart from the fact that it conserves your cash longer with a deep diver and you keep your stocks longer with a winner? A backtest perhaps?
Regards,
Karel
I think I prefer the term Retarded AIM.
When I plugged the Floating Safe into the Lichello cycle, it very much killed the action. I think one of the ideas of Lichello is to buy/sell proportionally more on dips/tops the deeper/higher they are. See Twinvest, see Synchrovest, see AIM. When you dampen that action with a floating safe, you are left with a sorry critter. It might show a little action with very small swings, because the safes are low then, but I don't think this compensates for the lost action with bigger moves.
Can you show some attractive points of Retarded AIM, apart from the fact that it conserves your cash longer with a deep diver and you keep your stocks longer with a winner? A backtest perhaps?
Regards,
Karel
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
