gigwoof -
'Monkeytrots, this is IHUB, not RB, if you believe BB and I are wrong and can substantiate why, the burden is now on you to elaborate.'
Yes, this IS Ihub - not RB. And reasonable discussion is the founding principle of this board.
Anyway that it is cut, the SEC FILINGS for ERHC, to be generous, are full of errors. Numerous errors. That is evidenced by their own filings. Carelessness, Incompetence, or deliberately misleading filings that are being forced to be corrected by the SEC ? Any of those three possibilities are equally possible and reasonable explanations for what is being seen in ERHC filings.
Quoting from a pre-14 (as balance attempted to use for his 'proof') is not kosher. Why ?
The reason that the 'pre' is on that filing is because the SEC slap that restriction on the 14 filings. That pre is slapped on by the SEC because the SEC have, themselves, determined that the filing is deficient.
BTW: I have been 'here' a lot longer than either yourself or BB - so I am quite familiar with what IHub is all about. The
sarcasm really was beneath you, gigwoof.