Hi Minsk, and welcome back to the board. I'll be glad to respond to your comments:
In English, what WR was saying is that he and a colleague developed the framework for digital licensing which Allan Klepfisz glommed onto as he didn't possess either the energy, motivation, intellectual depth, or credibility to do the same.
In English, he is also saying that, unlike BLLN, Mashboxx was not sued by essentially every business partner AND investment group they were associated with. As we know, Oracle is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of plaintiffs suing Allan and BLLN.
And in English, what Wayne is doing in here is hardly ranting. He generally answers questions in a polite fashion. Regardless of how rude, childish, and disrespectful the posters have treated him in the past.
No, the ranting is from those who believe that being a pink sheet security or a "speculative" stock somehow provides BLLN the opportunity to lie and promise undeliverables at their leisure, and that when posters who WITHOUT ANY BASIS IN FACT OR SOURCING predict something "good around the corner", they should do so without impunity. In other words, they shouldn't be confronted with the facts of exactly what happened the LAST time they promised such things.
Let me ask you a question, Minsk. Do you have any analytical data to support your position that this is the "worst funding season ever"? Do you realize that Allan has been floundering to deliver for 3+ years now?
AI
