InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 533
Posts 36556
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/08/2008

Re: hestheman post# 18566

Saturday, 03/13/2010 9:51:47 AM

Saturday, March 13, 2010 9:51:47 AM

Post# of 42851
Correct, apparently she brought up rule 9019 with Rosen, effectively saying that there are other parties to consider here, namely the UST.

I can't see the UST signing off on this, when he was the guy who put the EC together in the first place. He would look like a complete idiot and hypocrite.

I've spent the past 20 hours reading, analyzing, drinking and some sleeping and I've come to the conclusion this was a ruse that enabled a few things:

1. A delay on SJ, and not dragging JPM/FDIC through the mud on that.

2. A chance for covering and for loading up. I mean the PQs at $8 was ridiculous manipulation. Once you crunch the numbers we are in the 10 - 20% range even with this tripe of a 'settlement'.

3. A chance for WMI, JPM, and FDIC to tell the world 'it's over', and when the real settlement comes out no one will notice.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.