InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 887
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2009

Re: FFF post# 45033

Friday, 12/04/2009 12:10:20 AM

Friday, December 04, 2009 12:10:20 AM

Post# of 83049
i can tell from amilewski3 report.
---------------------------------

Posted by: amilewski3 Date: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:38:08 PM
In reply to: pwf123 who wrote msg# 44542 Post # of 45035


" the price was alright but we weren't getting it. sempra was charging cprk for 60k worth of non-existent freight, and also charged for double treatment for smelting of the CuCon. so 600k of CuCon, we were only getting 325K, which is bull$hit cause because freight and smelting should never go above 25%, and were paying over 50%. "



i apologize for my mis-wording of the 25%, basically out of the 100% in a shipment, roughly 25% is wrote off for freight, treatment, and smelting of the CuCon.

============================================================
can you further explain what this means? Thanks.

" ...theyre a fledgling mine so when their smelter is over charging, and is writing off almost 50% of the CuCon as un-useable (which supposedly isnt the case, and industry average is about 20-25% bad con per shipment)..."

does that mean their con is no good according to the smelter standard or are they shipping concentrate that is less than 20-25 % copper?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.