InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 188
Posts 25264
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/25/2009

Re: enzymesarecool post# 142462

Friday, 05/22/2009 11:19:43 AM

Friday, May 22, 2009 11:19:43 AM

Post# of 192568
So what was the market value of the stock at the time these shares were issued? If shares were issued 3 weeks prior to DEC. 1, 2008 then the share price was .0012 and 5 times that is .006 so EESO got $2,700,000.00 in equipment and investment money (assume above numbers and daters are correct). Restrictions on shares are for one year per SEC regulations. So one year from being issued they can hit the market so they all should still be restricted. Then is the 200m additional to the 450m or included in it? And it was said do to on going negotiations the name of one party could not be revealed but the names of no parties were revealed??? Usually 5% ownership of a public company is public knowledge and when such party buys or sells that stock it needs to be reported. What were/are the liabilities he mentions in the letter? And what has come of those ngatiations and liabilities? I wonder if some of those people are also involved in the buyout and if they are and have been very close to the company for some time (even years)? It would be great if EESO would start clearing some of these things up. With all that is happening of such positive nature it seems it would be time to start clearing this things up. After all they are a public company using our money. They are not private (however it seems being pinksheet allows public companies to appear private). If anyone has updated info on any of this it would be helpful. 450m possibly 650m shares is a huge % of this company. Would be nice to know who these folks are? And what their intersts in EESO is? They may have a big influence on our future.


May you be Blessed by living in interesting times!