InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 24
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 10/09/2007

Re: public_eye post# 106376

Tuesday, 07/08/2008 2:55:23 PM

Tuesday, July 08, 2008 2:55:23 PM

Post# of 143047
Several users have asked us to respond to that alleged filing.

We do not know who or what "Investors Web Site" is.

Investors Hub has not received ANY legal notifications or requests for user data. We will not release any such data without a valid subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Assuming we ever do receive receive such a subpoena, we will not produce any type of user data without first attempting to notify the affected parties and allowing them an opportunity to seek a quash. Further, Investors Hub may choose to object to any such subpoena itself, assuming one ever materializes.

The above position is a matter of longstanding policy here, and our extensive experience in these matters is that threats of this nature generally lack any credible legal basis and are often intended to distract and/or intimidate. It is extremely rare in our experience for such threats to ever actually become reality, and even in those occasional instances when a threatened subpoena does materialize, they rarely are sufficient to overcome the significant legal hurdles necessary to acquire user data.

Since there is no specific mention of Investors Hub in that filing we will not comment on it further at this time and afford each reader the opportunity to judge the credibility of the filing and those whom it is made on behalf of for themselves. To be clear, there has been no apology requested of nor made by Investors Hub, nor is one contemplated since there is no possible basis for one.

Next, we have offered great latitude in allowing company communication that violated our rules of conduct to be posted on this board simply because it was what the company was choosing to communicate to shareholders.

However, it's now just getting down right silly and it appears that emails purportedly from the company are simply being used to thwart the TOU of this site. It also looks as if these supposed communications from IR are meant to stifle and intimidate Users here. This is against the spirit of this community and will no longer be tolerated.

Public documents (filings, wire published press releases, etc.), even if they contain discussion of "bashers", "naysayers" or frivolous lawsuits can remain. However, communications from the company that are not publicly accessible should not be posted and should be removed if they violate the TOU.

Any questions, please send a PM to IH Admin.