As long as there is a market to sell into, the buyer of discounted shares cannot lose any money if he makes this simple move:
Say he is able to buy discounted shares at .0075 and the pps on the public board is at .0100. He can short those shares at the .0100 and lock in the difference as guranteed profit. His only loss potential is if the stock goes up above the .0100 and he will not get the additional appreciation unless he covered the shorts and held onto the stock. Sometimes the agreement prohibits the shorting of the stock and/or requires the buyer to maintain ownership until a designated future date. I think some of the discounted deals with Jacoba had those stipulations or some of them, I don't recall for certain. Ever notice how sometime there is a quick pop followed by a sharp drop, or vice versa? That maneuver can be accomplished either way. Ever wonder why such a cheap stock appears for a short while on the naked short list? Ever wonder about the timing of a PR not seeming to be logical? I hope some day just one or two of the announced deals actually materializes and produces some valid profit for this company and then the CEO will not have to rely on Rahoul, or whoever, to provide the funding sources. I think Rahoul has, or has had, a contract that we pay for to provide his services to obtain that type funding. Millions of our investment dollars have been drained from the company in these deals but as has been pointed out before, there would not have been any other source available unless they could hook up with some potential customer who would be willing to either buy part of the company or perhaps prepay for a future service.
The fact that Dean gave himself a percentage of future revenues (not Profits) indicates to me that something may be coming as perhaps a onetime source but perhaps not a very profitable source. I say this because he showed his greed at the worst possible time. Most CEOs who were sincere about fighting for the shareholders would be very embarresed to pull off such a maneuver when the stock is at all time lows and as is said, the cash register is not ringing.
Efforts on this board to pump the pps, in my opinion are having the opposite effect due to the fact the info being fed does not materialize and therefore results in a loss of confidence in the company which results in not only damage to the reputation of the company but a loss in shareholder support. I had rather see the real facts placed into the open and when they are addressed and dealt with then perhaps confidence can be reinstated and shareholders will again become enthusiastic about being owners of the stock.
A little too longwinded but I am worried that if something does not happen soon to confirm there will be significant revenues soon then we will be in a reverse split and totally gone and I do have a very significant amount of funds riding on the outcome. I just want to advocate that the pumpers let up and let's address the facts as they are. Telling shareholders that launches are coming by identified dates and then providing no explanation to the shareholders when they do not occur just destroys all confidence except to a few who refuse to recognize anything negative, no matter what. We need accountability, not more lipstick painted on the pig.
AI
