InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 3539
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2006

Re: optiskeptic post# 81763

Tuesday, 12/04/2007 1:10:41 PM

Tuesday, December 04, 2007 1:10:41 PM

Post# of 115222
CORRECT, IMPLIED. But most longs, even the biggest shareholders on this board said, it was for voting purposes. But why even mention voting in that PR, if it didn' mean anything. Saying voting implied that is what the dividends, blah, blah, blah, was all about. Now everything is up in the air. Nothing definite from anybody, especially from AURC. So now it is to mean the shareholder's meeting is not about voting on anything???????? Guess it must be a listening meeting. Indian