InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 2924
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2003

Re: wbmw post# 27294

Wednesday, 02/25/2004 5:16:34 PM

Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:16:34 PM

Post# of 97794
The point, of course, was that Intel would have pulled out all the stops in the past, to prevent 'CT' from being necessary. Your argument is that Itanium would be a great workstation chip, if only Intel would get around to building some infrastructure. That seems unlikely in light of the first point: the infrastructure would've been rolled out last year, or before, as part of Intel's attempt to successfully market Itanium.

Doug
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News