I have been following Amy's posts and I have been following yours. Both of you, in my opinion, post quality information worth consideration. Your differences lie in the "how" of what happened rather than in whether or not the official story is correct. Without universally acceptable and easily obvious truths, those differences are very divisive.
It took me two years after the fact to even consider evidence that was being presented about the official story being bogus. I was a loyal American, former Peace Corps volunteer, not versed well enough in history to know that "war is a racket." If contrarians right after 9/11 had insisted that there were no planes involved, I doubt that I would have read further for I know what I "saw." And, I have no sophistication in the field of video animation that would lead me to delve into the intricacies of video inaccuracies and alterations.
The most salient argument to me, the one that got my attention,
was the physics presentation. One thing I do know is that the immutable laws of physics cannot be suspended for a few hours on any given day. The most impressive website was Patriots Question, for I saw that credentialed people, too, had a problem with the official story. How, exactly, 9/11 was pulled off, we may never know conclusively. But, the fact that the official conspiracy theory doesn't add up is well worth investigating and I am in favor of a new 9/11 commission which is free from conflicts of interest and has subpoena power.
Just my two cents worth. But, I appreciate the efforts of both of you.
AI
