InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 4525
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/04/2006

Re: Footquarters post# 22425

Wednesday, 08/15/2007 2:00:26 AM

Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:00:26 AM

Post# of 388900
Hey FOOT, I got out of the shorts on close and still expect a tiny up before OpExp but I cannot be optimistic for the future. Scam has a great post . I have no agenda …but IMHO
we are going DOWN. The cycles and the waves people live in two distinct stables. I am intrigued by the possibility that for the Qs the classical nominality of Hurst might not be IT. I have a suspicion that an interaction of 2 cycles [A(100wks) = 2,5B(40wks)] might do the tricks. That means that you will have a nest of lows only 0.5 of the classically predicted times. This is suggested by the interaction between two numerical filters that measure “temporal nonstationarity” and which are adjusted accordingly. Anyway, here are two charts to laugh about: 1). shows the historical fit of such cycles, and 2).....in next post

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SPY News