InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 153
Posts 41232
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 06/11/2001

Re: 100lbStriper post# 29253

Saturday, 05/24/2025 6:15:58 PM

Saturday, May 24, 2025 6:15:58 PM

Post# of 29566
Stokd $NLST Re: Netlist CAFC 160/060 Reply. Remember Samsung claimed Netlist addressed the "wrong combination", and had some wondering if Netlist new counsel—CAFC specialist & previous head of firm Samsung used at PTAB to invalidate the patents—made such an obvious and critical error…to address the wrong combination in arguments against Samsung/PTAB. Well, he's got it covered...never trust Samsung's claims!

“Samsung’s assertion that Netlist addresses the “wrong combination,” likewise fails. According to Samsung, the Board started with another reference, Rajan, and determined skilled artisans would “implement” Rajan “using . . . Kim’s TSV[s]”. That rewrites the Board’s rationale.”

“The Board adopted Samsung’s contention that skilled artisans “ ‘would have been motivated to connect additional memory dies to Kim’s TSV1 and TSV2’”. The Board’s combination was based on Kim. Samsung cannot escape Kim’s teaching away and seek affirmance based on a Rajan-focused combination the Board never invoked.”
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4113388/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4113389/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4113391/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4113397/default.png

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/615794185
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NLST News