InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 764
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2018

Re: chazzy1 post# 136056

Thursday, 05/08/2025 9:10:05 PM

Thursday, May 08, 2025 9:10:05 PM

Post# of 136528
Excuse for the interruption.
Amazon case related patent RBR '606 and other related patents '815 and '005 are all tied together and may be vital for arguing the meat of the AntiTrust and Class Action cases - viz. Wi Fi calling feature in smart phones. VPLM's bulls eye is the Wi Fi calling feature integrated into smart phones. It may even touch the MG appeals case in the use of DID database developed by VPLM provided that Mr. Hudnell is replaced by a more aggressive attorney who believes in and UNDERSTANDS VPLM technology and CLAIMS. Stick to claims, not weird precedents.

Don't ignore the Wi Fi calling case in the US court brought by a South Korean professor in which VZ lost $847 million. Probably TMUS lost too!

It is taking a long time to pull various patents, court rulings, etc. for a cogent post.

In a nutshell, there is a good chance for winning the MG case in the appeals court based on past precedents (with a better attorney.) Review all precedents ruled by them. VPLM's current focus is probably to develop a theory of their case to prove charges of monopoly, fees, deception, anticompetitive efforts, etc.

VPLM will come back later to AMZN '606 case, which is also solid in theory of technology used for Wi Fi connections. They do not need to prove patent infringement in the AntiTrust and Class Action cases.

When the summary is done it will be posted. In the meanwhile, key words: Wi Fi calling, DID database.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News