InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 144599
Next 10
Followers 23
Posts 4944
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/02/2013

Re: NoMoDo post# 142377

Monday, 04/21/2025 2:48:46 PM

Monday, April 21, 2025 2:48:46 PM

Post# of 144599
Hindenburg was cited repeatedly. And if there were transgressions on their part then they should be called out for it. But the vast majority of the work that Hindenburg did was spot on.

I'm about halfway through reading the complaint. It's damning and casts Foote, Sharp and others in a very negative liight.

As for the "failure to state a claim" that was indeed the judge's reason for dismissing the case without prejudice. That's not up for discussion.

The new claim may have corrected those deficiencies. Let's see what the lawyers have to say about the new version.

And by lawyers, I don't mean you. Because you're just as much a lawyer as I am. Which is to say...neither of us is a lawyer. In any sense of the word.

I don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up in a scam stock. So I'm one up on you there.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HMBL News