InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 5231
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 04/05/2017

Re: GetSeriousOK post# 33261

Thursday, 10/31/2024 6:44:11 PM

Thursday, October 31, 2024 6:44:11 PM

Post# of 33354
If you look at the document in this link, you will see Rohde had studied the Sofpulse in 2010/2012 and had positive results. Interesting how the more recent study showed no factor of improvement.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.petvetbiomed.com/html5/Web/10200/9%2520Assisi%2520Loop%2520-%2520Clinical%2520Overview.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwih0JDr07mJAxVISzABHcmTGmIQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3h8B3JnQP30rBkWbvMeuPm

I have talked to people that swear by the technology and it's usefulness and/or effectiveness. Unfortunately, the scientific studies are mixed across the board and this is why the insurance companies do not support the cost.
The original Sofpulse, with the wired loops to a machine, were used for treating diabetic sores many years ago with the past ownership. 

PEMF continues to be studied by new groups of doctors and scientists. 
There is a private company using a device/technology very similar to Sofpulse for the treatment of Alzheimer's.  Will be interesting to see the results of that study when completed.


I spoke to a Dr. (years ago) that was convinced PEMF treatments most definitely assist with treating Alzheimer's. He just never did any true scientific studies and he was using a different PEMF device.