Transocean Ltd. (RIG)

[eastunder]

No. I'm gonna have to disagree with you. I'm still gonna go with One and the same. ;)

(Each having around 89.5 Million shares would just be a weird coincidence, right? )

I'm going to base this on what the filings state at the bottom - in green

Perestroikas filing
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1451505/000141588924020700/xslF345X05/form4-08052024_100807.xml

Explanation of Responses:
Remarks:
Perestroika (Cyprus) Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Perestroika AS. Due to Perestroika AS's designation of a member of the board of directors of the Company, Perestroika (Cyprus) Ltd. may be deemed to be a director of the Company by deputization. Perestroika AS's right to designate a member of the Company's board of directors has since terminated.

and then...

Mohn's recent filing
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1451505/000141588924020696/xslF345X05/form4-08052024_100805.xml

Explanation of Responses:
1. These securities are held directly by Perestroika (Cyprus) Ltd., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Perestroika AS. Mr. Frederik Mohn is the sole director and owner of Perestroika AS and is the indirect beneficial owner of all securities owned by Perestroika AS.

One and the same BUT...

Why two filings for the same shares? There must be a reason, aye? Is that how that works in a case like this. Since Perestroika is owned by Mohn's?

Curious minds want to know now!