You could be absolutely right, dlog.
Because I believe in the huge potential of lenz to effectively treat, and then to possibly prevent, a huge number of indications, and also because I believe in the good character of our management, I have made it my objective to try to understand what this management team is doing to get their lenz into the market. And I have shared my conclusions and opinions here.
Yes, there would have been benefit with an earlier recall of the loaned shares. It would have amounted to a blip on the radar. Even if it staved off the bankruptcy, the momentum would not have been sustained, without news leading to our ability to generate a revenue stream.
In the US, and in the UK, we're looking for regulatory approval for lenz to treat covid. That would cause the FDA and the MHRA to destroy the markets for Pfizer and Moderna, who provide the vast majority of the regulators' operating funds. It would also threaten the value of the intellectual property OWNED BY THE REGULATORS in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Regulators would be slicing their own financial throats by approving Humanigen's lenzilumab, and the Novavax vaccine that uses lenz as an enhancement.
We have to capitalize on the IND authorization by having partners use lenz under IND for their vaccine and CAR-T products. We also need to exploit our opportunity for regulatory approval of lenz from Australia, to treat CMML. It's almost "game-over" for the attempts to deny our revenue stream. We will prevail. It would be an absolute catastrophe to use mRNA technology to fight a virus that could have 100% mortality, such as the Pangolin Coronavirus.
We need to see regulatory approval of lenz, which is most likely to first come from Australia. And the flood gates will then be open.
And that's when management can recall their loaned shares to the fullest monetary advantage.
AI
