AI
Friday, September 01, 2023 7:29:01 PM
And half of them were lower. If you read a little more into the 43-101 it's also stated "Empirically, the writer observed that the resampling of holes T96- 06, 08, and 09 yielded many assays that appear to constitute roughly half of the historic value". Page 71. So, some resamples are higher than the originals, and some were lower including "many" that were 1/2 the historic value. It happens.
All kinda moot anyway. Tannahill's a dog. Woof. Look at the vertical longitudinal - Figure 47. The mineralized pods (I use the term generously) are tiny and they're cut off at depth by weaker drill holes. They killed it. I don't buy the author's argument for an untested downfaulted plunge without a structural study on oriented drill core (I doubt they did oriented core drilling), but again, the mineralized lodes are tiny!!! Why chase that down plunge with deeper drilling? Better they spend any coins they find in the Tims' parking lot on their 2 carbonatite properties.
All kinda moot anyway. Tannahill's a dog. Woof. Look at the vertical longitudinal - Figure 47. The mineralized pods (I use the term generously) are tiny and they're cut off at depth by weaker drill holes. They killed it. I don't buy the author's argument for an untested downfaulted plunge without a structural study on oriented drill core (I doubt they did oriented core drilling), but again, the mineralized lodes are tiny!!! Why chase that down plunge with deeper drilling? Better they spend any coins they find in the Tims' parking lot on their 2 carbonatite properties.
