InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 1671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/08/2005

Re: KQforever post# 28049

Wednesday, 02/14/2007 1:57:25 PM

Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:57:25 PM

Post# of 63795
KQforever:

Your questions are certainly good ones - and I need to speak plainly regarding them:

I have no way of knowing how USSE has found a means of using Nanobacteria as an agent when Nanobac is still trying to prove the existence of such constructs.

Therefore I do not know if USSE used them hastily or not.

I would assume that if indeed nanobacterium exist, they would be everywhere in nature already and that the use of them would not affect anything at all in a dangerous way.

I know only the science I have read on the subject of nanobacteria. I do not know for a fact that this is indeed the science the company uses. I know only what has been released as public information by the company.

As to the probability that nanobacteria exist, I believe from the perspective of evolution, (unless you ascribe to the theory that the world was literally created in 7-days), it would be quite logical that even the simplest of single-celled organisms would have had even simpler precursors. An example as to the types of organisms these may be have been, are found today within cells and are known as organells, and other structures (ribosomes, etc), which appear to respond independently of - but with some coordination with - the cell itself. The concept of the existence of short peptide chains - without cell walls - that would organize themselves in some manner so as to produce an impact on their surroundings is certainly a reasonable point-of-departure. That impact could be anything from creating a difference in polarity within the context of their surroundings, (a weak electric charge), to active production of reaction-enabling compounds, to simple DNA structures with the ability to only replicate. It would also seem that these compounds would not simply disappear, and that they would be with us today - perhaps facilitating processes such as photsynthesis, and reactions to which we ascribe other mechanisms at present, etc. They would serve as primary or secondary catalysts relative to even other catalysts.

Its a wonderful world we live in.

JL