Moon Equity Holdings Corp (MONI)

[StocksGoneWild]

That was explained in great detail by the company, Maria. I can sum it up for you in case you missed it. Nathan Hall tried to pull one of his many scams on the new incoming company, just like he did to all of his shareholders here for YEARS. Lucky for us shareholders, Frank sniffed out his bullshit with his auditors help, and kicked that POS to the gutter where he belongs. Is it really so hard to believe that Nathan tried to scam Frank and the shareholders like he has for years? Nathan Hall screwed over a lot of people over the years, and some of those people have such a deep seeded hate for that POS and possibly a touch of Stockholm syndrome, that even though that trash bag is long gone, and has absolutely zero to do with MONI, and that whole false narrative has been clearly and completely debunked, some of the old WOGI shareholders that were screwed over by NH just simply refuse to let go, and hold on to some sort of false narrative that Nathan Hall is still involved here even though that has been 100% proven to be completely false. I mean just look at that IBOX, Maria. You see all of that straight up BS fiction written there? What's all that about I wonder?

I'm just asking simple questions, Maria.

Maybe their last press release confirming that they lied to investors last year has something to do with the market's wan response to the launch (finally) of the bitgift platform.

Frank didn't "lie to investors" and what do you mean by "(finally)", Maria? I was led to believe that the BitGift platform was all fake and just a "ruse" to try to "fool" specific individuals? Remember that? I do. How did it go from being "all fake" to "finally" launching?

I'll add that to my false narrative checklist:

"Frank lied to investors" ✔

Quick questions, Maria: If Frank is such a bad guy, why did he retire/cancel those 2 billion shares BACK to the Treasury? If he was such a bad guy, why didn't he just keep em and sell them into the market or dole them out like he could of? Why has their been practically zero dilution from the company, no notes, toxic debt, and he's paid for virtually everything up to this point out of his own pocket? How exactly are shareholders like myself at risk here, Maria? The truth is, Frank is nothing like Nathan Hall, in fact, he's the opposite imo. I think it's safe to say that if Frank was a bad guy, he's had plenty of opportunities to do the wrong things for shareholders, yet so far, going on two years now, imo he's done right by the shareholders, and is literally the complete opposite of Nathan Hall. Look, I get it, Maria. If I was ripped off and lied to by that shady POS Nathan Hall, I'd be mad too, but the wild fantasy that still lives in the IBOX and the false narrative that still tries to lead me to believe that Nathan Hall is controlling Frank, and because of that Frank is a bad guy is just that, pure fantasy. Can we agree on that, Maria?