InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59334
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: Wahoo98 post# 69522

Thursday, 09/22/2022 5:40:27 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2022 5:40:27 PM

Post# of 74941
Rocket Man humbly stated his expertise was solutions…….

ie problem solving.

His and other SFRX paid promos for years have had a premise, and that is technology is outdated. He even called it antiquated.

THAT’S A BUNCH OF WORM POOP! They’re blaming current technology to deflect from their continued failure.

The problem SFRX has that needs to be solved is their research and method of operation.

It’s all jacked up.

The Baer’s report is available for all to read. Year and year after year its the same ole crap. They’ve found some debris that could be from a dozen wrecks.

If the main wreck SFRX doesn’t even have rights to is not at Melbourne, as Baer’s reports strongly suggest, what the hell are they doing trying to inspect mag targets that keep coming up empty?

There’s a wreck out there that’s decaying and subject to more deterioration from fishing activities.

They told the USPTO the Toy doesn’t find wrecks, but is used to scan wreck sites after they have been located. They need to locate a wreck to scan, but any wreck carrying billion$ would have a wreck site littered with treasure. You wouldn’t need a Toy to tell you it was there.

And if no treasure was visible, blow a few holes and check it out.

Oh wait, SFRX doesn’t need blowers.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News