InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59361
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: wlfr01 post# 69512

Thursday, 09/22/2022 2:01:58 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2022 2:01:58 PM

Post# of 74983
“None” is why I said SFRX’s research is…….

unreliable.

And its not just “none,” it’s “none” in 15 years. Whoever is doing their research needs to be shown the door.

$23MM and all they have is “none.” They don’t appear to be serious about their results with that kind of record.

You can have all the techno gadgets in the world, but if your research can’t show you where to start looking and create a search area, then your gadgets are useless.

There’s always a possibility you stumble onto something, but over 99% of all wrecks weren’t carrying valuable cargos. A salvor needs to know what wrecks with the right legal profile were carrying valuable cargo, and have a general idea of where they sank to be successful.

Now as far as the commercialization of the Toy, I’m not in the loop.

It seems to me they should demonstrate and PROVE it identified various non ferrous metals.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News