InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 2761
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: None

Sunday, 08/14/2022 9:14:45 AM

Sunday, August 14, 2022 9:14:45 AM

Post# of 790489
OUR NEGOTIATOR PUTS FORWARD BLACK-AND-WHITE OPTIONS.
Option 1: Taking of our stocks at fair value. FNMA=$99; FMCC=$176. The UST would pay the same PER for both, 3.2 times (Deferred Income included. That's the main reason of the difference in price)
Overall $112B profit in a Conservatorship of 14 years.
100% ownership of FnF.

Option 2: Charter revoked.
$180B UST net refund.
$11B loss in a 5- and 6-year investment in SPS of FMCC and FNMA, respectively, as part of the UST backup of FnF in the Charter.
0% ownership.

The option 1 is the most profitable for the UST, but the White House and the Congress will suffer more backlash from the public than in the option 2, because it's paying a price above the market value, whereas in the option 2, the market is the one that puts the fair value on the stocks (at least a PER 13 times in this case), $250-$300ps.

This is why either option has to be thoroughly explained and, most importantly, accountability, because it has to be addressed also the $56B worth of moral and punitive damages, which are also used to settle the 6 securities law violations.
We won't allow the hedge funds to settle these violations directly with Sheila Bair and her gang at FnF, through the judge Lamberth's court.