Monday, June 13, 2022 6:46:39 PM
We do know that Dr JJ study was targeted for late stage patients, so possibly NIH tried to mirror that for validation purposes.
India clearly has seen benefit from their study, hence their issuance of EUA. So there is clearly some sort of mismatch between the trials. The devil is in the details. You have probably already seen this report on outcome of the India study. https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A91aa11ad-10cc-3179-8838-1a6d8b949439&fbclid=IwAR005OpIYAc0QcsmmB78gNm4EDk46WeImEX4sgtJ3xE5RUr4sSShD7ZiiJA&fs=e&s=cl#pageNum=1
VPR Brands LP Reports Record Annual Financial Performance for Fiscal Year 2023 • VPRB • Apr 19, 2024 11:24 AM
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM