Tell you what would liven it up right?
1. Berman has confirmed Covid right?
2. Berman has a smartphone, right?
3. Berman has a working Genviro kit, right?
Berman takes a vial of his covid strips from 3 and shakes it.
He takes his smartphone (2) and films himself as follows:
He shakes the vial, and removes half of the strips within at random.
The rest he places back in the vial. He wipes the vial with alcohol and passes it out of the room to be picked up by an accomplice.
Then - still filming - he takes each of the selected strips in turn and fills them with a saliva sample that he films himself putting into one of his receptacles.
And he films each one of the strips being inserted into the sample and films the result that the meter produces.
Almost all should of course be positive.
Then his accomplice takes the vial that was passed to him and shakes it. He films himself doing the exact same with all but one of the strips - which he pulls out at random and sets aside.
Almost all should of course be negative.
He places a distinctive mark on the one remaining test strip that was set aside and places it back in the vial and passes it back to Berman who films himself getting a positive result with that strip, taking care to show the distinctive mark thereupon.
None of that would be remotely difficult for Keith to do. It would be facile in fact! If only he has item 3 at his disposal.
Shame then, that he does not!
Berman always cited difficulty in accessing Covid clinical samples as an excuse to why he had not come up with data that would velidate his claims about Genviro's efficacy... (despite this presenting no obtacle to literally hundreds of other diagnostics companies)
Well all he needs to do right now is open his mouth and spit, for all the Covid sample he could wish for! ... and yet... Still Nothing!???
And obviously, there's still no point in pricking his finger obviously as he won't actually find any covid virus in his blood, despite being riddled with the infection!
I think therefore that in this particualr case, we CAN actually say that absence of proof IS, in fact, proof of absence!
