Coretec Group Inc (CRTG)

[twaflyer1]

crtg... Yes, any substantive change to the original product, may change the way it affects the vehicle's performance, as you don't need much to completely invalidate the promises made! Then to patent something which is not qualitative, but only quantifiable, makes no sense at all! That cannot be patented! There has to be a qualitative change, and that has yet to be arrived at! Then, there was work on other Variations as evidenced by the 12 other Patents I assume to be related to the CHS product, which shows that the Inventors pushed the Patent limit to the fullest, if indeed those 12 other Patents are under the same Umbrella as the original Patent!

Of course if the prescribed time limit on the Original CHS patent has run out, then anybody can then rush in and take it over! But then again, there might be other Patent provisions CRTG must conform to before they can do anything like that?

Therein lies the problem to some degree, Provisional Patent over Provisional Patent, extension over extension, which might impress a few, but causes some of us to become suspicious? Then Kraft & Co' has not yet devised a workable CHS type, as evidenced by EVONIK's stoppage of production, maybe due to there being no valid Patent by CRTG, IMO? They might have a Patent Application in the works, but the Patent is yet to be completely validated? The USPTO must completely Validate a product before it is ready to hit the streets, though a Patent Application gives the Company some leeway in commercializing it! Now I have been away for a while and things might have changed for the better IDK? Then if CRTG took over the CHS patents from NDSU, why is it taking so long? Just shows that there is much red tape no matter what they try to do!

Most Co's want to see a Patent before they work on one that is promised to be as effective as the original CHS, or hopefully being better, but has NOT YET BEEN PROVEN, qualitatively, to be different, yet with the same attributes, or better, of the CHS, by the USPTO? That was partially the problem when a Licensee, CRTG, Brought the NDSU patent to Large Companies years ago, where they realized that the Licensee Co' had holes in it's pockets, where a great amount of cash was needed to further the development and testing required by them in order to introduce the CHS product into their systems! IMO...