One; openly declaring that she hates these types of cases.....how do the principals in the case get any comfort around her not just capriciously making rulings just to be done with the case?
Two;, the one firm that she worked for in the private sector has represented Apple since they first went public in 1980. If she were still a privately practicing attorney, she most likely would not be permitted to represent VPLM by the conflicts officer at her firm......so it would seem that presiding over a case would be out of the question.
I am just a casual observer who knows little about the actual technicalities in the practice of law, and these two were easy for me to identify. I will leave it to others who are more properly equipped to point out other examples, although these should be enough.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
