Peer review is the opposite of spin. You demonstrate your ignorance by thinking otherwise. Again, if NWBO announces TLD without publication, they’d have to wait until a conference to defend any false attacks because they can’t comment on the topline data until then. That’s the type of situation bears salivate for. If NWBO tried to correct something, AF (or media like him) would tell the conference they could not present because they broke conference rules. He’s done that very thing to other companies. <br /> <br /> Science is complicated and AF is not going to be the one to initially define these results. Peer review is.