InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 6406
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/11/2004

Re: None

Wednesday, 05/12/2021 10:24:04 PM

Wednesday, May 12, 2021 10:24:04 PM

Post# of 360589
Thus, the undisputed facts prove that ERHE’s purported explanations, affirmative defense, and other circumstances, do not meet the high burden of a “strongly compelling showing” to avert a sanction of revocation. III. ConclusionFor the reasons set forth above, a sanction of revocation is appropriate and necessary for the protection of investors. Accordingly, the Division requests that the Division’s Motion for Summary Disposition be granted and that the Commission revoke the registrations of each class of ERHE’s Exchange Act Section 12 registered securities. Dated:April 15, 2021 Respectfully submitted,_________________________________ David Misler(202) 551-2210 Sandhya C Harris (202) 551-4882 Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549-6011

Timbeeeeeerrrrrrrr----------