InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 82
Posts 40269
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/05/2010

Re: Koog post# 372960

Sunday, 05/09/2021 3:28:31 PM

Sunday, May 09, 2021 3:28:31 PM

Post# of 471627
It has nothing to do with 'feeling' but rather the deserved evisceration of a simplistic, silly, book.

And you know as well a I do that this in particular IS a pertinent criticism of some posters on this board.

The book is a criticism of beliefs that no one holds, a denouncement of an ideology that no one believes in and condemnation of things that no one would ever say.

Not unlike a few posts on this board.

In 2005, Republican Congressman Paul Ryan said that Rand was "the reason I got into public service", and he later required his staff members to read Atlas Shrugged.[96][97] In April 2012, he disavowed such beliefs however, calling them "an urban legend", and rejected Rand's philosophy.[98]

Ryan was subsequently mocked by Nobel Prize-winning economist and liberal commentator Paul Krugman for his reportedly getting ideas about monetary policy from the novel.[99]

In another commentary, Krugman quoted a quip by writer John Rogers: "There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year-old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."[100]


Contemporary reviews[edit]

Atlas Shrugged was generally disliked by critics. Rand scholar Mimi Reisel Gladstein later wrote that "reviewers seemed to vie with each other in a contest to devise the cleverest put-downs"; one called it "execrable claptrap", while another said it showed "remorseless hectoring and prolixity".[68]

In the Saturday Review, Helen Beal Woodward said that the novel was written with "dazzling virtuosity" but was "shot through with hatred".[69] In The New York Times Book Review, Granville Hicks similarly said the book was "written out of hate".[70]

The reviewer for Time magazine asked: "Is it a novel? Is it a nightmare? Is it Superman – in the comic strip or the Nietzschean version?"[71] In the National Review, Whittaker Chambers called Atlas Shrugged "sophomoric"[72] and "remarkably silly",[73] and said it "can be called a novel only by devaluing the term".[72]

Chambers argued against the novel's implicit endorsement of atheism and said the implicit message of the novel is akin to "Hitler's National Socialism and Stalin's brand of Communism": "To a gas chamber—go!"[74]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.