Monday, March 01, 2021 6:58:41 PM
IVDD Directive 98/79/EC, in particularly annex III is FAR more exacting than that!
But in any case, in what sense falsely advising someone infected with a potentially deadly and highly infectious disease that they are clear to go about their business, rather than isolating and seeking treatment could be construed as "doing no harm" is not entirely clear to me!
Safety and Efficacy Most CERTAINLY are the requirements underpinning IVDD CE 98/79/EC requirements!
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1998L0079:20090807:EN:PDF
Genviro will no doubt fall flat at Annex I (General requirements):
Then there is annex III
There is a lot more stuff in there about QMS, documentation, ya da ya.... the full 9 yards in fact.
The Authorised agent has to be able to produce the full Device Design History file and test data, upon demand, to the Relevent National Authorities that actually enforce the harmonized standards.
If they can't and they are CE marking, its a bust!
VPR Brands LP Reports Record Annual Financial Performance for Fiscal Year 2023 • VPRB • Apr 19, 2024 11:24 AM
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM