As in the legal side of things, or as in the company is done, as in thrown in the towel? If it's the later, I'd like to present the argument that, either way IHSI was on-the-hook for ~$600K funded to them. If not mistaken, that money went directly to the original owner of Cresent Construction, as part of the purchase agreement, but I digressed.
Continuing, control of the business operation, Cresent Contruction, was yanked away from IHSI by TCA, therein preventing Devon from continuing daily operations, following through on secured contracts (of $10M) and growing the business operations as planned. There should be retribution owed by TCA for pandering and for those predatory lending practices and for ceasing the momentum of operations of Cresent Construction. Suspending business operations, directly affected Devon, Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc. (the company) and we the shareholder. As part company owner, we the shareholder, should be demanding retribution from the court, as the value and tremendous growth opportunity of IHSI was ripped away from company and we the shareholder. Recall, nine months revenue (2017) was $3.2 million and $5.5 million projected FYE17 and $10 million was in the wings for 2018. All that money was rescinded pending the legal outcome. This IS IHSI's case and should not be overlooked or ignored.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.