InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 200789
Boards Moderated 19
Alias Born 12/16/2002

Re: janice shell post# 41117

Sunday, 11/22/2020 9:54:13 AM

Sunday, November 22, 2020 9:54:13 AM

Post# of 48180
Frankenstein gets a mention in the decision. Talk about getting laughed out of court! Oh the horror.

In the case, Trump's legal team led by Giuliani had attempted to claim that the Equal Protection rights of two Pennsylvania voters were violated because the state had allowed counties to decide whether absentee ballots sent in with technical problems could be fixed by the voters. The two voters in the lawsuit said that in their counties, they were not allowed to "cure" their ballots, and thus had their ballots rejected, while other counties, like heavily Democratic Philadelphia County, allowed voters to "cure" absentee ballots. That discrepancy, they claimed, meant that Pennsylvania's election results in their entirety should be blocked by court order, which theoretically, could deprive Biden of the state's 20 Electoral College votes.

Brann called the legal reasoning behind the Trump campaign's Equal Protection claim "Frankenstein's Monster."
"The answer to invalidated ballots is not to invalidate millions more," Brann wrote.


https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.