Home > Boards > The Lounge > Politics > Civil Discourse

'How' Trump will contest the election

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
B402 Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 114
Posts 29,296
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 11/17/09
160x600 placeholder
Colgate-Palmolive Taps New CFO As It Navigates High Demand
Colgate-Palmolive Co. named a new finance chief as the maker of Softsoap and Ajax cleanser continues to navigate high demand for products such as soap and pet food during the coronavirus pandemic.
U.S. Bond Yields Climb on Post-Election Outlook
Top Company News of the Day
Nestlé Buys Meal-Delivery Company Freshly as Pandemic Boosts Eating at Home
U.S. Labor Department Curbs Sustainable Investing in 401(k)s
General Motors Poaches Delta CFO to Fill Finance Seat -- Update
General Motors Poaches Delta CFO to Fill Finance Seat
Latest Covid-19 Wave Worries Hospitals Even With New Treatments
Dow Wraps Up Worst Month Since March
Dow on Track to Wrap Up Worst Month Since March
Wheat Down Again on Russian Rainfall
Walmart to Put Guns, Ammo Displays Back in U.S. Stores--2nd Update
Walmart to Put Guns, Ammo Displays Back in U.S. Stores--Update
Nestlé USA Acquires Meal-Kit Delivery Provider Freshly in $950 Million Deal
Unemployment Expected to Tick Down -- Data Week Ahead
Pfizer, Mylan Agreement With FTC Over Upjohn Deal, Clearing Way for November Closing
When Less Is Less
Judge Kicks Off Scheduling in Google Antitrust Case
Exxon Posts Third Consecutive Quarterly Loss for First Time -- 3rd Update
Square Inc. Shares Drop on WSJ Report of Possible Acquisition of Credit Karma Tax Unit
Colgate-Palmolive Taps Pitney Bowes Executive Sutula as Finance Chief -- Update
U.S. Personal Income +0.9% in Sept; Consensus +0.5% -- 3rd Update
U.S. Personal Income +0.9% in Sept; Consensus +0.5% -- 2nd Update
B402 Member Level  Friday, 07/03/20 10:07:38 PM
Re: None
Post # of 98 
'How' Trump will contest the election

https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEKDHumqlXcl17F02kAzd9bkqFwgEKg4IACoGCAowzdp7ML-3CTCRx_0F?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

should the president lose - he will claim the vote was rigged and rely on a complicated gambit involving emergency powers and the compliance of Republican legislators to stay in the White House.

He will supposedly blame mail-in ballots and Chinese election interference for the loss and invoke emergency powers to launch a Justice Department investigation into alleged "election hacking" in the swing states.

From there, Mr Wirth claims Mr Trump will stall until 14 December, which is the date when states must appoint their US Electoral College electors. Because the swing states are each controlled by Republicans, Mr Wirth believes the state legislatures will refuse to certify their electors until the election hacking investigation is finished.

He then claims the Democrats will challenge the investigation and the challenge to the election, which will eventually be taken to the US Supreme Court. Mr Wirth believes the Supreme Court will rule against the Republicans, but will concede that Mr Trump's emergency powers authorise him to continue his investigation. The Supreme Court will also maintain that should the swing states not be able to certify their selectors by 14 December - for any reason - then the Electoral College will have to meet and vote for the president without the swing states included.

Under Mr Wirth's theory, the Electoral College will then meet without the swing states under investigation, and neither candidate will receive enough votes to secure the presidency. According to Mr Wirth, the contested election would then move to the House of Representatives, where each delegation gets to cast one vote towards the presidency.

Since there are more Republican controlled House delegations than Democratic controlled delegations - 26 Republican to 23 Democrats - the Republicans will be the victors of the vote and Mr Trump will remain in office.

Mr Wirth claims the plot is not far-fetched, and points to Mr Trump's threat to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the US military against demonstrators at the George Floyd protests, but notes later on that the "recent resistance of our military establishment is an encouraging sign and necessary component of the 'people's firewall'".




Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences