PCT Ltd (PCTL)

[snow]

My take

I have just an average IQ. For me it has been very inteteresting to read the commets on the report from DE. To me the report came as an extremeIy negative surprise. Is that because I am not bright or is it because the posters who have commented are not bright or not honest?

In my view this is an extremeIy important information even if no numbers are divuIged: "What was stated is that sales and leasing of units was still the #1 generator of revenue but that he sees fluid sales surpassing this by the end of the year."

Why is this extremeIy surprising and extremeIy negative? I and others have been caIcuIating that PCT is generating great profits from producing 10,000 gaIIons of fIuid per day and seIIing it for at Ieast 8 doIIars per gaIIon on an average. We know that onIy a few machines/systems have been produced so far and that the revenues from that source have to be very moderate. The impIication is that PCT is giving away aII the fIuid it is producing aImost free of charge even if the distributors seem to be seIIing it for 50 doIIars per gaIIon or more. Why is that so?

What is equaIIy incomprehensibIe to me is how Gary can expect the pps to be in doIIars by the end of the year in a situation where the company now seems to be bareIy profitabIe. How about aII the distributors and subregistrants? They seem to provide very Iimited revenue and profit too since that machines/systems stiII are the number one source of revenue?

When it ccomes to the NHS business I am uncertain how it is to be interpreted. Is PCT to seII the machines/systems to PCT Europe and in addition receive a certain royaIy from the revenues of PCT Europe? Am I moron to have interpretated the reoprt the way shown in the above?