InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 121
Posts 17456
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2014

Re: jomama9231 post# 261421

Friday, 04/03/2020 3:27:59 PM

Friday, April 03, 2020 3:27:59 PM

Post# of 423549
Why isn't that an appealable error by the court?

If the question is whether certain aspects were obvious for a patent for TG > 500 but literally none of the trials that Du is considering were for TG > 500, how is that not an error and how is that relevant? And the why isn't the fact that she found that relevant appealable?

Like the example that I gave earlier about a cancer trial for 70+ year olds. If a 5 year old accidentally takes it and dies, could it be concluded that this drug is deadly for 70 year olds?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News