InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 427
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2020

Re: brooklyn137 post# 31651

Sunday, 03/29/2020 3:40:42 PM

Sunday, March 29, 2020 3:40:42 PM

Post# of 54915
You make a valid point

You make more money getting in before the facts are established. Makes sense.

But surely no one would invest in something that all the evidence points to NO right ?

That's the boat I find PRED in right now. A whole lot of people here who are convinced based on a single PR and tons of info online that not only doesn't support the PR but in many ways calls it into question

Still looking for answers ...








-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have created this signature below in order to avoid repeating myself :

My focus is proving or disproving what was written in Predictive Technologies recent PR

The relationship between Dablood and Predictive Technologies - is it real ? The PR isn't enough evidence for me I need OTHER sources to verify it's true

Please don't say "it's all in the PR" - I want objective sources

Specifics include :

1) Have Dablood really sold 38 million kits ? - Show me evidence (Not the Predictive Technologies PR)

2) Can Dablood really do 1.5 million kits per day ? The last thing on the internet was their upgrade Jan 31 to 20,000 per day. How did they jump to 1.5 million per day in a couple months during the worst pandemic and lock down in China when companies like Apple couldn't even get their regular manufacturing going never mind upgrade it. - Evidence please (Not the Predictive Technologies PR)

We also recently saw a news release stating DAAN can produce up to 500,000 per day (one third of the claimed Dablood 1.5million production). Why can DAAN only produce 500,000 per day but one of their tiny subsiduaries' subsidiaries can do triple ?

3) Why aren't Dablood on the China government list of 19 approved test makers. If their are "on" the list through their minor indirect stake holder Daan then why is Daan application for a different testing method than what is displayed on the Dablood test box labelling ?

4) Why aren't Dablood OR Predictive Technologies on the FDA list of approved makers for USA market ?

5) Why did Dablood do a press release boasting about entering European markets, Korea and Japan but never mentioned the USA ? (Please don't tell me it's all in the Predictive Technologies PR - I need OTHER objective sources of information)