Inventergy Global, Inc. (fka INVT)

[TennisStar]

ITC Verdict is in-2/18/2020 Judge McNamara ruled today No. 337-TA-1138

“I have found that Complainant INVT SPE LLC (“INVT” or Complainant”) has failed to prove by a preponderance of evidence that any of the Respondents, whether Apple Inc.....I have found that none of the Asserted Patents is essential to the 3G or LTE standards. I have found that INVT has failed to prove by a preponderance of evidence that any Accused Products satisfies an asserted patent claim that remains in this Investigation....I have found that Respondents have failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the Asserted Claims is invalid....I have found, alternatively and only in the event that my finding on technical prong of the domestic industry requirement is reversed on review, that INVT has satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement under Sections 337(a)(3)(A) and 337(a)(3)(B).”

Wow. Not much more I can say but, wow. So did INVT satisfy the ecominc prong if reversed in review? Will there be a settlement to make everything just go away? Should we be concerned that this information is publicly available on ITC EDIS, yet Mr. Beyers and Inventergy have provided no updates whether through a press release or SEC filing? Is this a material event? What is going on? I can’t post the document but you can log into ITC EDIS and read it for yourself. It’s 3 pages long. Thoughts and comments appreciated.

https://edis.usitc.gov/external/?loginPrompt=true