Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:22:13 AM
You agree that WaFd challenges the warrant, but later you add:
What? the lawsuit is a dramatic explanation of a Takings claim and in the prayer for relief, it asks for damages for the taking of private property. A warrant can't be deemed Takings and later allow the Govt to exercise it. Primarily because HERA only authorized the purchase of the warrant (iii) to protect the taxpayer (from losses). Exercising the warrant today would be only for profits, unauthorized in HERA.
The warrant is a takings because the warrant is deemed Beneficial Ownership in regulation, regardless of having been exercised. The damage on the stock price occurred in 2008 through today. We expect huge damages for the common shareholders.
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM