InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1335
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2012

Re: jobynimble post# 306066

Wednesday, 01/29/2020 8:50:40 PM

Wednesday, January 29, 2020 8:50:40 PM

Post# of 312025
Nah... I dont think so

Pyrolysis of plastic is, was and will always be a non-starter since it is a money loser from the get-go. Recycling plastics into usable products such as building materials is profitable and will ALWAYS be the go-to for recycling plastics...

When everyone who believes pyrolysis is the answer realizes the above is the day the *angst* will disappear...



Here is a good read

U.S. could support investment in 260 new facilities

(Not to mention some securing 260 million in finance)

Oh yes the opposition fears this deeply

Plenty of room for all

In this updated report, Economic Impact of Advanced Plastic Recycling and Recovery Facilities in the
U.S., the American Chemistry Council (ACC) explores the potential opportunities that expanding
advanced plastic recycling and recovery technologies, referred to within the industry as chemical
recycling, could have on economic output and job creation in the U.S. This burgeoning class of
recycling and recovery technologies can convert used plastics into a range of products, including raw
materials such as crude oil, chemicals and chemical feedstocks, transportation fuels and other
petroleum-based commodities. ACC found that that the U.S. could support investment in 260 new
facilities using these advanced technologies and this could result in:

• 38,500 jobs supported by new advanced plastic recycling and recovery facilities, including:
o 9,400 directly employed by the facilities.
o 15,100 jobs in supply chain industries that support these facilities.
o 14,000 payroll-induced jobs supported by workers in these plants and their supply
chains spending their earnings.
• $2.2 billion in annual payrolls.
• $9.9 billion in U.S. economic output from new plastics recycling and recovery operations,
including:
o $4.1 billion related to increased products generated by the facilities.
o $5.8 billion in additional supplier and payroll-induced impacts.



https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152909922