I don't totally object to your reasonable expectations for moving this agreement with Nulixo along...I suppose it could very well go down as you have stated. From Nulixo's position, if they are compensated for the repairs to #3, then your plan works. However, I do evaluate RH's next move regarding a "fait accompli", which also includes Nulixo, somewhat differently. RH has got to be sitting back, after many years of his company being illegally shorted, thinking what is the biggest bang for the buck at this point and into the future?? Literally, within a couple week's time, with a couple of well placed 8-k's, agreement signed, initial monies exchanged, licensing, monitoring and services, municipalities via Nulixo identified, etc....the entire landscape of PTOI changes dramatically!!!
Does a month or two fixing the machine (they know the machines and process works)...testing product (they know what can and can't run)...potential breakdowns= $$(after so many years of non-use).....and THEN signing an agreement...IMO.... does that deliver a "fait accompli"??
Realistically, you can't expect Nulixo to pick up the tab on EVERYTHING... RH and PTOI will have to dig for this also. The well, through the years, no doubt has run dry....options look much better with a significant SP increase and positive outlook on the future.
I believe Nulixo and RH are on the same page in terms of getting a machine into use....but somehow...I see their methods, based on some historical data, non entirely lined up. Given that financing this monster may be an issue, I think RH is well aware of the options and has consulted with the right people to play this out.
We'll see...
GL PTOI'rs
