Coreton Wednesday, 10/30/19 02:05:50 PM Re: Rudeboy415 post# 43245 Post # of 47905 Interesting. I have not found any reference to the exhibits as it relates to this MSJ. Not saying it’s not acceptable I have just never heard of exhibits for a separate motion being referenced for a pending motion for which there has been no ruling. Motions are heard on their own merit. Seems they would risk losing all their MSJs if a single aspect of any were denied/dismissed because the dismissal would squash the exhibits so attached making them unusable. Maybe I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure each motion must be accompanied by its own exhibits even if duplicated in other filings.