Read that article bar1080 and found it confusing at best and misstated/misleading at worst.
Take for example this sentence:
What are they talking about? Old Sears hasn't borrowed money from anyone that I know of. And who has "emerged from bankruptcy protection"? Certainly not old Sears, which is still under bankruptcy protection as far as I know.
I think this whole article can easily just "confuse" people between old Sears and the "new" Sears, which was bought by Eddie Lampert and Transform Holdco.
No wonder that so many people continue to hold their worthless SHLDQ shares.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.