InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 192
Posts 14413
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

Re: Ranger185 post# 73480

Friday, 09/20/2019 11:53:53 AM

Friday, September 20, 2019 11:53:53 AM

Post# of 96896
I am not sure about that now. I was in the CAFC courtroom when Chen remarked about the weakness of the '822 patent. However, in a follow up statement, he remarked that the other patents didnt have the same problems. I re-read the the '679 and '565 patents to get a better feel for them. '565 is a minor supplemental patent, but '679 is a fix to the '822 problems and is the major infringement going forward. Wayne had to hear that remark and take it back to the 13 if they are in contact. '679 appears solid and there will be no escape for the 13- I cant see them putting that in front of a jury.

All information provided is the opinion of this poster from review of information in the public domain.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.