Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[AZrealestate]

It didn’t sound to me like the plaintiff’s would push for anything involving the warrants in the settlement. But, since the 5th circuit ruling made clear that the conservator was not preserving and conserving when they enacted the NWS, wouldn’t it stand to reason that some courts in the future may conclude that taking 80% of the companies after everything that has transpired thus far, would not be in the best interest of the companies in their quest to recapitalize, etc? Or is it your opinion that because most of the current lawsuits don’t address the warrants, that the Gov will throw caution to the wind and exercise them just since nobody is challenging them, with the exception of the Washington Federal case?