InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 4714
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 10/26/2000

Re: lrice post# 6

Sunday, 11/26/2006 10:06:55 PM

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:06:55 PM

Post# of 47
We in America were given a republican form of gov which Noah Webster and others of the time 1750-1820 defined as a government with an established code of laws ie (ten commandments, Bible, the laws of nature and of nature's God) to which men could add but not subtract; and they could not add anything which went contrary to the primary set of laws.

The idea of a pure democracy was repugnant to them and that's why we weren't given a pure democracy. Although since the 1930's
Democracy and Education by John Dewey, gov schools have been used with intent to change the perception of America from being a republic to one of being a democracy (with intent of undermining the pre-set form of laws, the absolute laws).

By the 1950's the mass-democracy and evolutionary laws had pretty well replaced any concept of pre-existing Absolute Laws and the Republic.

BTW, through out history, pure democracies degenerated into anarchy.

The reason our way of electing officials (to the REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF GOV ) called a democratic vote,.... the reason that worked was because most of the people most of the time had mostly common ground on most things.

When pure democracy (without a pre-set and limiting form of law) is given reign, then each minority group of differing opinions tries to pass laws which we can characterize as "All blue eyed people have to pay double taxes "

Can't have a working democratic vote system to elect representatives in a strongly mixed culture such as we're fighting for overseas. It wouldn't have worked here, and it won't work over there. Why? Heart felt foundational differences , irreconcilable. Like trying to get the Jews and Arabs to accept a vote to decide who rules.

Ain't gonna happen.

So, if Admiral Matt reads this and comments I'd appreciate it.

Seems to me he doesn't want an archy here, and so has established rules. This is just to explain the limits of rules. It boils down in the end to this: you have to trust the wisdom of the judge (moderator) and evaluate his whole board.

cause some guys will cloak their personal attack with bacon and honey, and also include a comment about the stock to say it's on topic and not a direct personal attact, or they will try to rule by their opinion of what is vulgar or acceptable.


Isaiah 7:15 tells how Jesus was feed only good things until such time as he had acquired wisdom to know good from evil.


In the gospels, Jesus explains it is possible to break a lower rule in order to keep a higher rule such as healing (law of love) on the Sabbath (which ordinarly says don't work on the day of rest)

So rules don't cut it. Wisdom, love, mercy, truth , and acceptance, and reconciliation do.

Have a good day, for this is the Day which the Lord has made,
and I will rejoice and be glad in it.


Set your desire to Eternal Riches, the true riches.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.