InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3170
Posts 208744
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/04/2004

Re: TenKay post# 97701

Tuesday, 06/25/2019 7:30:23 AM

Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:30:23 AM

Post# of 164022
No, I asked for proof of a pinksheet stock that clears insider Restricted 144 Shares in less than 12 months...and the 1 example you provided was on a company that was engaging in toxic funding with chip carebourn of all the 3rd party toxic funders out there, and that has absolutely ZERO to do whatsoever with VYST granting Restricted 144 Shares to their insiders and the obvious proven FACT that any VYST insider who received/receives Restricted 144 Shares for consultancy services all the while VYST remains trading on the PINKS, is automatically subject to a 12 month vesting/holding period on their Restricted 144 Shares!

And folks have been talking about the 20M Restricted 144 Shares Jamie Rotman recently received in March of this year, and the 33M Restricted 144 Shares Greg Rotman recently received in March of this year, ever since VYST's financial results reflecting both those VYST share issuances came out.

So they haven't been ignored one iota, and it's not VYST investors problem if anyone chooses to ignore the fact that as obvious VYST insiders, neither Greg, Jamie or CEO Steve Rotman, can sell any of their Restricted 144 Shares without filing notifications both BEFORE and AFTER any proposed insider sales any of the Rotmans ever choose to make here, some future day after the 12 month vesting/holding period passes on any of their Restricted 144 Shares hahahahhahahaha weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Never buy or sell based on my posts! My posts are just my opinion!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VYST News