Home > Boards > US OTC > Delisted > Revolutionary Concepts Inc. (fka REVO)

There are 2 Points that Sound extremly positive

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
endlich0 Member Profile
 
Followed By 9
Posts 1,099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/14
160x600 placeholder
endlich0   Monday, 06/17/19 02:25:54 AM
Re: SamuraiAnimated post# 68186
Post # of 68248 
There are 2 Points that Sound extremly positive to me in nr 6 and 7 -the words
6: " revo had no income at THIS TIME " yes ok but in the future it will have

7 : Revo owns 40 % Ali owns another 19 % percent of the income out of the patents ….if he owns those 19 % via fraud, they go back to REVO ;)




6. In January 2014, at Ali’s direction, REVO began issuing press
releases stating that REVO was negotiating a worldwide licensing agreement for
its patents. Ali is quoted in the press releases as saying that the forecasted annual
revenues from the deal is “in the $20 to $30 million range,” which was significant
because REVO was not generating any revenue at the time. In February 2014,
REVO announced that it had entered into a licensing agreement with an
unidentified exclusive, worldwide licensee, and forecasted “$30 million in
revenues and $12 million in earnings” from the deal.
7. REVO and Ali failed to inform investors that, among other ties,
REVO owned 40% of the licensee and a trust established by Ali owned 19% of the
licensee. Ali also had no legitimate basis for forecasting $20 to $30 million in
revenues or $12 million in earnings from the license agreement.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist